“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“Can you tell us how many incarnations we will go through on this planet?”)

(“At what age did I die in that incarnation?”)

(“Frank Watts, what weakness must I watch out for in this incarnation?”)

Incarnation. [...]

(“Seth, have you ever been on earth in two or more incarnations at once?”)

[...] The scope of consciousness will be so broadened in the future that all personality fragments, split personality images, and even individual fragments in succeeding incarnations, will be held in clear focus without strain. [...]

In the meantime, when incarnations on the planet earth are finished the entity moves toward this goal anyway. [...]

[...] You can rely to some extent on Jane’s intuition, which has been strong in all her incarnations. [...]

(“Can hypnosis send an individual ahead into his next incarnation, or into life after his earth cycle is completed?”)

[...] Entity is split during incarnations. [...]

[...] You made the blueprint yourself, and your various incarnated selves are not consciously aware of the blueprint. [...]

(“Sometime in the future, will you help us reconstruct a family tree of our incarnations?”)

[...] Wall or walls are the divisions between your various personalities, and also represent the times of incarnations. [...]

(“Free will exercised during this present incarnation on the part of Jane’s mother?”)

(2. What procedures are available to the nonphysical personality when it decides to incarnate physically for the first time? [...]

[...] It is particularly dependent upon emotional characteristics — not necessarily of the last incarnated self, but the emotional tensions present as a result of a group of past existences.

You may have already decided for example, now, upon the circumstances for your next incarnation. [...]

[...] After the final incarnation, the physical, sexual type of creativity is simply no longer needed. [...]

There are, however, no rules dictating the sexual development in varying incarnations, except that experience with both sexes must be taken on, and the various characteristics developed. [...]

[...] In some incarnations, the abilities might be used so powerfully that all other aspects of the personality remained in the background. [...]

[...] On occasion they also serve as mediators, introducing to each other two incarnations of one personality, for example.

(“Did you know me, Rob, in a previous incarnation?”)

In this life, or rather before incarnating in it, the personality then chose to purposely minimize the intellectual area; not, now, to punish himself, but to understand in and through an exaggerated form, the experience of those far less mentally gifted than himself.

(Seth first referred to his incarnation as a minor Pope in Jane’s ESP class session for May 15, 1971. [...]

[...] [If so, I hadn’t been quick enough to catch it; I could have asked about it at once.] Since Seth gave A.D. 300 in the class session for last May, I personally think it more likely that his papal incarnation followed this date, taking place in the fourth century. [...]

(Of course we would like to learn more about the incarnation in question. [...]

[...] These incarnations are all simultaneous.

[...] When I wondered if I was right in thinking it likely that Seth’s papal incarnation took place in the fourth century, Jane said she “got” the year A.D. 325. [...]

It must be recognized also that these portions of the self exist in each incarnation. In the materialization of personality through various incarnations, only the ego and the layers of the personal subconscious adopt new characteristics. [...]

[...] You must take it for granted also, you see, that this probable self has operated in each incarnation, in each materialization of the whole personality, and has therefore at its command literally millions of probable situations and conditions upon which to make value judgments.

(“Seth, when you were incarnated on earth as Frank Watts, did you know a Treva Watts?”)

The next step is taken when identity is able to include within itself the intimate knowledge of all incarnations. [...]

[...] A very small case in point would be an individual who is as aware simultaneously, of all his incarnations within your system, aware of them happening at once, and yet aware of himself as the whole who experiences these existences.

The separate incarnated personalities however are still separate identities. [...]

[...] Loren in particular, in spite of past male lives, is strongly feminine, and your sister-in-law is undergoing her first female incarnation.

Far be it from me to give either Ruburt or yourself swelled heads, but in your cases we see the male and female aspects well-balanced, one of the reasons why this is your last incarnation. [...]

Without the stages of childhood, adulthood and old age, the personality could not expand to its fullest degree, and without various incarnations the entity cannot expand. [...]

[...] That is, in many cases for the previous incarnated personalities to correspond with the present personality. [...]