1 result for (book:ecs1 AND session:494 AND stemmed:portrait)

ECS1 Session 494, ESP Class Session, July 15, 1969 8/71 (11%) Bega Theodore Ned portrait Brad
– The Early Class Sessions: Book 1 Sessions 9/12/67 to 11/25/69
– © 2008 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 494, ESP Class Session, July 15, 1969, Tuesday

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(To Brad:) Now I am sitting here for my portrait. You may indeed get only our friend Ruburt. But then you may get more than your friend Ruburt. The camera may be comprehending or it may not be comprehending.

[... 18 paragraphs ...]

Now, I will let my friend—(laugh from Ned)—you, as Ruburt would say, you are looking for it! And those who look for it in this room, get it. The portrait is a portrait of Ruburt as a woman in one of the past lives mentioned—and in that particular instance, as a grandmother of twelve children. Strongly gifted psychically—given to hovering in dark forests—and a midwife. Now, he does not know this, so I will give you the honor of telling him. I will now let our friend take a rest. And you may rest if you are up to it.

Now, I will tell you (Theodore) something. Bega is there and I will let you tell me which portrait is his. You may ask Bega or tell me. But you did not pick the correct portrait. (Theodore commented that one was “too much Hebrew.”)

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(Theodore holding up a portrait.) That is not Bega! I want you to seriously consider each one of the paintings and tell me which one is Bega!

Now. I do not want to see another painting. I do not want an attitude that says, “Is this it?” I want an intuitive feeling on your part and a recognition. Do you intuitively feel that that is a portrait of Bega?

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

Now. What is your (Theodore) intuitive feeling? Now I want you to look at the portrait. Close your eyes. How much reality does the portrait have for you? Can you see it in your mind’s eye?

[... 1 paragraph ...]

That is because it is the portrait of Bega. But you did not pick it out as your first choice. Now, Bega has been here as I have been here and he was calling you to look toward the corner of the room—and you were too intellectually smug to do so as Ruburt is often too intellectually smug to do what I ask him to do. And your own intellectual ideas prevented you from first picking out your intuitive choice, as far as the portraits were concerned.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Now, you see what you are willing to see, and it is stupidity to consider suggestion as the result or the cause of what you see. It is stupidity in class to worry that suggestion would cause a given result—for suggestion causes whatever you see. You form your physical reality through suggestion and expectation. You experience what you expect to experience at a subconscious and a conscious level. And therefore, as Ruburt is very careful that suggestion is not involved, so he has also had you be overly cautious, and there have been many opportunities in class that you have missed for this reason—and these are the bets that I have spoken about earlier this evening. You have the ability to see more than you saw and you have the ability. You enjoyed your passivity (to Ned) to the point of an enjoyous giving-up; and instead, you see, there is a point within passivity where you are passively alert. And you went beyond the point and lost what you might have seen. As our friend here went beyond the point (referring to Theodore), looked at the portraits and consciously—for you did not make an original, intuitive, judgment—but consciously looked at these portraits in terms of nationality, age and all the requirements that you thought of.

[... 30 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

ECS2 ESP Class Session, July 21, 1970 negative Brad vinegar cruddy thoughts
TES9 ESP Class July 15, 1969 tm Bega cw sw wl
ECS1 ESP Class Session, September 16, 1969 Matt Areofranz Mimi Rachel palm
ECS1 ESP Class Session, October 8, 1968 bell task Lafinda ring brandy